Showing posts with label Business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Business. Show all posts

Monday, September 17, 2012

coconara

coconara is a micro-service platform for mostly non-physical goods.
It is a mix of Quora (for having someone to answer a particular question) and 
Amazon (for actually selling the product online). 

What I think interesting and attractive about coconara are two things; contents and pricing. 

coconara contents are bizarrely unique and attractive. 
For example, I have requested some professional advice for this blog to become 
better and more interactive media. The advisories are all professional and although 
they can only give their advice with certain limitations (due to price mostly), 
it is truly amazing experience to have someone to take a look at such things. 
Other stuff I instantly purchased was romance advice from experienced lovers, 
and even more substantial stuff such as logo for my friend's rock band. 
Other offerings include "revise your resume", "advice for MBA essay questions", 
"diet" and etc. I realized that at the end of the day,
 all these trivial things that make me very happy.
To add, ,most of sellers in coconara are individuals. 
So you directly feel as if you are connected to the person by buying their product.

Another critical coconara factor is its pricing. 
At coconara, every service is only for 500 yen (roughly 5-6 US dollars). 
This is such a huge advantage of coconara, and I hope they will continue the price or
even challenge lowering the price.
In web or in any other scale-able businesses , the product must be "insanely" cheap. 
I don't know about average prices of online consumer retails, but 500 yen pricing so far
does seem to work. 

I hope coconara will grow further with better quality controls, rich service lines, and so on.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Business Model Generation

Business Model Generation is a book focused on how to generate innovative and robust business models. If you have an entrepreneurial spirit, or if you want to become a change agent, this book can help you how to architect 
the business structure. The question here is,this;


"How the business model in your organization can cope with 
fast-changing and competitive situation"  

The book aims to give you insights for how to create the business and build strategy. 


Business model is about value proposition. 
It is about how your organization can create a value to customer and deliver it. 
This book decomposes a business model to 4 domains
 (customer, value proposition, infrastructure, finance). 
For 4 domains, there are 9 building blocks. 
9 building blocks are;


CS (Customer Segments)
     => Customer segments are groups of people of which your 
          organization trying to interact. So to question, for whom 
          shall we create a value? and identify who is "the most" 
          important customer. Below are examples of CS.
               a). Mass market
               b). Niche market
               c). Focused market
               d). Diversified market
               e). Multi-side platform (e.g. credit card/retail store) 


VP(Value Proposition)
     => What value does your organization propose to customer?
          What particular does it solve?
          What needs does it satisfy?
          To which CS and what product/service does it deliver?
          ...VP is to answer above questions in order to make the 
          organization "valuable". Following three attributes can
          greatly contribute the successful VP.

                 - Newness of product/service (e.g. Ethical Funds)
                 - Performance (HDD)
                 - Customization (


CH(Channels)
      => Channel is a path defining how it communicates and
           delivers the service to customer. Consecutively, 
           how you can integrate the channels.  


CR(Customer Relationships)
      => You can classify the CR as followed;
             - Personal Assistance 
             - Self-Service 
             - Automation (e.g. Genius)
             - Community (e.g. GlaxonSmithKline)
             - Collaboration (e.g. Amazon book review)


R$(Revenue Streams)
      => How can your organization generate revenue? 
           Or conversely, how does customer wants to 
           consume the product/service?
           - Sales of Product/Service (e.g. FIAT)
           - Fee (e.g. Hotel)
           - Subscription (e.g. News paper)
           - Rental/Lease (e.g. Car rental)
           - License (e.g. Intellectual Property)
           - Agent Charge (e.g. Brokerage Allowance)
           - Advertisement 


KR(Key Resources)
      => For value proposition, what resources are needed?
           - Physical Resource (e.g. factory, machine, system etc)
           - Intellectual Property (e.g. brand, IP, partnerships etc)
           - HR
           - Financial Resource 


KA(Key Activities)
       => What are the key activities in order to propose value/
            - Manufacturing
            - Problem Solving
            - Platform/Network
        
KP(Key Partners)
      => Who are the key partners? Who are the key suppliers?
           Which resource are you getting from which partner?
           Which key activities are your KPs engaging?
             - Optimization and Economy of Scale
             - Mitigate Risk and Uncertainty
             - Acquire resources and activities

C$(Cost Structure)
      => What is the most remarkable "cost" in business model?
           Which resource is the most expensive?
           Which key activity is the most expensive?


Once you find out, then you can map them out on canvas.
Good luck!




















Sunday, May 20, 2012

Work-Life Balance in Japan

Working in Japan is often referred as mere a attraction, besides its economical stability.
People work longer hours than any other countries on this planet, and
they work for incredibly detailed "quality" (let us call it). 
Although it depends on industries and firms of which you work for, 
people work generally 10-12 hours or more. It tends to evaluate the someone's work
by the length of hours worked instead of the content itself.
Cultural background (of self-sacrifice) has something to do with it, maybe.

However, when you look at the data, Japan is not so much of "the hard-working" country.
This article explains how intense the work situation is in South-Korea.
And it seems to have very similar characteristics of "old" Japanese work-environment.
I used to think, that Japan's work environment is bad. Yet given the statistics,
it may not be true. Of course, it does not make it easy by any means. 
I have seen so many westerners who work harder than Japanese.
As Sheryl Sandberg's article suggested (she leaves the office at 5:30), 
it is not easy for people to walk out of office early anywhere anyhow 
(you have to make up for it, if you want to stay or go up).

One thing that I can ask for Japan's work environment is that to open up doors to young workers.
In Japan, where society is well-structured and seniority is the main factor to determine the position in any organization,
it is very rare to get a responsible position (e.g. manager, director etc) in 20's or even 30's.
In a traditional organization, most of C-level slots are filled with50 to 60 year old veterans. And those traditional firms are often the first runner in the industry.
Perhaps this is a good way of managing a matured organization, but leaves a very little space for younger generations. 


Overall, I would like to summarize that 
work-life balance in Japan is not solely bad; it is stable and there are options.
However, it is extremely hard for young generation to find a space where
he/she can fully explore the potential to become a leader. 


The risk of becoming a leader in Japan will be described in upcoming entry.


Cheers!

Saturday, April 28, 2012

The Intelligent Entrepeneur

I just finished reading the book "The Intelligent Entrepreneur". 
An insightful, and very practical in some way to know what you will have
to go through once you decided to start up a company.
The Intelligent Entrepreneur by Bill Murphy Jr.

Marc Cenedella, one of three "intelligent entrepreneurs" who are described in 
this book, graduated Harvard Business School with a Baker Scholar, which is given to
top 5% of 900 students in the graduate program.

Marc started his own business before he came to Harvard.
He already had started a successful trading company and moved it into black.
But one night, he thought to himself,
that he won't be satisfied by doing that business for the rest of his career.
He chose to go to HBS and started up TheLadders.com after the graduation.
Marc Cenedella









Entrepreneurship is often defined as following; 
"the relentless pursuit of opportunity without regard to resources currently controlled".
So start-up folks dream big.
But the thing is, it is how the idea gets executed.
This book's narrative described in detail how 3 of HBS graduates including Marc,
struggled and succeeded making a company and creating an impact. 

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Vision and Mission of Watergate


Watergate is a creativity playground.
That is a platform. 
That is an Operating System

So what are the applications, and infrastructure of Watergate?

The applications that "play" upon Watergate platform varies.
It can very loosely be defined that 
"creative idea that changes people's lives".

What is "Changing people's lives?"
It is about innovation. It is about bringing something new to people. 
Why? Because we can. 

Let's make a difference with Watergate.



Wategate
Watergate Complex






























Sunday, December 11, 2011

働きながら、社会を変える。

金融機関に勤める著者は、週末や平日の夜などを利用して
貧困をなくすために立ち上がる。
業務で活かした金融やビジネスの専門スキルを活かし、カンボジアの貧しい村へ
小口融資を行ったり、児童介護施設を改善するために活動する。

彼を突き動かしたのは、"2.4%"という数字と、
ネットなどによるコミュニケーションの(以前と比べて)圧倒的な利便さ、
そして、誰よりも熱いパッションだった。

"2.4%"という数字
経済学者によると、

「極度の貧困を持続可能な形で終わらせるために必要な年間支出は、
先進国の人々の所得2.4%」

だという。これが小さいようで大きな数字だ。
例えば年収一千万円の人が、年間24万円も寄付をするだろうか?
年収500万円の人は12万円寄付する?
この記事(http://jp.blogs.com/2010/03/tax.html)によると
一般的なサラリーマンは、年収に対して約12%の税を納めている
わけだけど、(個人の善意にもよるが)2.4%って、
小さいようで大きい額だ。また、国家の単位になると、
個人で賄うには到底及ばない。
孫さんが100億寄付したとかで話題になったが、
日本の全員の所得の2.4%は流石に1人で負担することは出来ないだろう。
だが、多くの人に賛同してもらえれば、何とかなるかもしれない。
そんな希望を抱くのには十分な数字だといえる。

ネットの利便性
Eメールも、電話も、24時間タダで使えるし、電話会議をする為の
ウェブアプリケーションなどもあるから、実際に一箇所に集まらなくても
打合せ、個人作業は出来るようになった昨今。
こうした利点をフルに活用し、若くて優秀な著者やその仲間たちのような
ビジネスパーソンは、本業の傍ら活動していた。
生産的に、且つ、本業の専門知識を活かして、効率よく
プロのクオリティのものを。
メンバーも、金融、IT, コンサルタント、など様々。
まるで、一つの会社のよう。
こうして「バーチャル・カンパニー」ともいえるNPOが生まれたのだった。

誰よりも熱いパッション
「もし誰も手伝ってくれなくても自分ひとりでやる」
本書の最後に書かれていたが、激務で知られる外資系金融機関に勤める傍ら
こうした社会貢献をするのには、誰よりも熱いパッションがあるからだ。
在日韓国人である著者。高校卒業するとき、家庭の事情で
大学へ進学できない友人の姿を見て、自分が人一倍頑張ろう
と決意したと書いてあった。思わず、胸が熱くなってしまった。
ニートをしていた時期もあったという。

自分を照らし合わせてみた。同じ思いは、ある。
でも、僕に何ができるだろう?
最後に、貧困という問題が、日本という先進国でも身近にあるということ、
そして、更に深い問題があるのだと考えさせられた言葉を引用する。


「だれからも必要とされず、だれからも愛されていないという心の貧しさ。
物質的な貧しさに比べ、心の貧しさは深刻です。
心の貧しさこそ、一切れのパンの飢えよりも、もっともっと貧しいことだと思います。」
マザー・テレサ




Sunday, November 6, 2011

Dragonfly Effect



 


 What is Dragonfly Effect?

-On How to Change the World using Social Media-



This book is about how to change the world using Social Media.

Even if you are a regular guy with no particular big titles or positions in society,
it is possible. The book reveals a story about Samir who succeeded to find the donar
for his leukemia. Samir gathered tens of thousands of people registered using social media
to get the right donar, which is really hard to find. 

If you want to take action using social media, the book says, 
you have to follow this first 4 steps of Focus + G.E.T. 

Focus means on have a clear objective and request for the people
whereas G stands for Grabbing people's attention by something vivid, personal, or inspiring,
E is for Engagement that is about how each person can relate to the subject matter
by their personal experience or achieving higher esteem, 
then finally,
T is to take action and it is about providing the tools or environment where
participants can join and take action. 

Take this blog for instance. I have not given enough time before I started.
Now looking back, some of lists as below can be made;

Focus is what?
 - To be read by many people?
 - To improve my writing?
 - To communicate?

Grab Attention?
 - Vivid? not visually appealing, I think, compared to other sites.
 - Personal; yes it is very personal but it may not be important for others.
 - Inspiring; I try to be, but I somehow fail to be at times.

Engage?
 - What I want people to engage in this blog is to read, read, read. 
 - Hopefully a reader can spread out my entry using twitter or facebook/

Take Action?
 - There are small buttons after each entry so that readers can share with.
 - The comments are welcomed. 
This blog has everything! But why am I not getting the big amount of visitors?
Maybe, I can follow the 5 design principles to narrow my focus?

HATCH: Five Design Principles of Finding the Focus 
Humanistic
 - To know the users/readers. Don't rush into conclusion. Make a plan.

Actionable
 - To achieve bigger goals, break it down into small tasks. 

Testable
 - Make the KPI, before execution. What is the expected result?

Clarity
 - Set clear goals. 

Happiness
 - Find a mean or objective for you and others to be meaningful.

The last portion of "Happiness" really is the key. 
I have to think of something that can become "win-win" for readers.
Also setting "Clear Goals" can be tough since this blog does not seem to have 
any destination. But something like number of visitors can be a goal. 




Saturday, November 5, 2011

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the Gap - Renaissance for Japans Entrepreneurial Spirits 

From 911 to 311

On a hot summer day of August 2001, a plane took me across the Pacific Ocean and landed to J.F. Kennedy airport, NYC. I was a high school student and took an exchange student program for a year. I was supposed to join a language camp as soon as I arrived and joining the local public high school from coming September.

Three weeks later, it was my first day at the Washington High School located southern part of Maryland State. I was the only Japanese student in the school and I could only speak few words of English I remember that I joined an Advanced English class for senior students in that morning, and slightly surprised that the teacher turned the TV on during the class. With my little knowledge of English back then and far less understanding of American culture, I remember thinking "wow, they turn the TV on during the class in America".  Apparently the screen was showing a series of Hollywood-movie type images, of which a air plane crushing into a skyscraper building. I glanced over the classroom to see how other students are reacting. I saw a girl who was crying quietly at the other side of room. Some seemed to be confused, very. After 30 minutes or so, the evacuation was announced and I had safely returned the home of my host family. The host family was there too, and explained to me what happened. It was September 11th.

Now let's fast forward the clock for about 10 years.

After the Tohoku earthquake, I often recalled my 911 memories, and remembered how U.S. had changed dynamically since then. Yet how Japan has changed from the earthquake is not as drastic as U.S.., or in other words, the fundamental issues such as national debts are being left out because of the disaster; nothing but only the damage remains after the earthquake for Japan.

In many ways, this kind of event changes life. Personally, 911 led me to major comparative studies of religion and philosophy at University and understanding the "core" difference of east and west. For thousands of years, Japan has played a role as melting pot for eastern cultures and studies. Chinese letters, religious studies, teachings, and paintings; they were originally from other parts of Asia, yet Japanese had adopted and digested their essences. In the modern times, Japanese took in western style of industrial revolution and became even better at it than the Western pioneers within few decades. Japan needs to foster a dynamic environment for the change with its agility and learning capability. Moreover, Japan needs to recognize its unique brand as a melting pot. Just as other neighboring countries had given great knowledge to a lone islanders, it is time to give back to the countries. In this sense, I would like to emphasize the importance of reinforce the "smart system" category in transportation and medical services.

Premises for Future Directions

I work in a global Hard Disk Drive Manufacturing company. At the same time, I am enrolled in 2012 Graduate Master Program of System Design and Management at Keio University. My research focus on how lithium ion batteries should be used for electric vehicles in order to reuse and recycle the batteries to other means. Yet, instead of going into the details of how the battery system works, in this essay, I would discuss more socio-economical themes of what industrial focuses and which directions Japan should be following. In my view, Japan should go through a pretty much same direction that IBM went through as the turnaround in 1990s: to shift their strategic focus on service industry instead of hardware, and increase the contribution of each person.

This is to say, for Japan, decomposition of automobile and technology hardware giants like Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, Fujitsu, and so forth. Especially for the former, automobile industry, the shift is important because it will be the growth imperative which I explain it in later chapter. As per increased contribution by individual, Japan still ranks in low for its GDP per Capita while the national GDP ranks in 3rd. This means that there is great inefficiency in the country to be improved. Easier to be said, however, providing opportunities for Japans minority in industry; women, elderly, and foreigner, is never so urgent than today. Furthermore, Japan needs more start-ups to accelerate these changes. More often than not, Japanese large corporate tends to act slow and avoid risks that withhold change.

Japan's Economical Growth Imperatives

A series of terror triggered by the huge earthquake occurred on March 11th has revealed an interesting attributes of Japan. Physical facilities such as nuclear plant showed vulnerabilities, which in fact are surprising for a country famous for a great engineering capability.

In Japan, about 70 % of people consider themselves as "non-religious". In fact, the religiosity of Japan is somewhat complex. It is based on three; Shinto, Buddhism, and Confucianism. Overall, they blended and shaped something fundamental beliefs of Japan. Now it becomes confusing because the people were praised for remaining high morale and self-organized at the time of emergency: foreign newspapers reported, with certain notion of surprise that no robbery of kind occurred during or after the earthquake. The entire nation has been through enduring energy conservations despite severe conditions. At times, it felt like the nation is like a factory assembly line, and everything is under control. It was TQM (Total Quality Management). For whatever the belief is, the intangible assets of Japan are such quality control systems implemented not only for industrial practices but also for daily lives. Such a unique quality of life style is a potential element of innovation.

I believe this attribute of quality management can be a pivot for Japan's industrial innovation. For many years, the automobile and high-tech hardware are dominant source of the economy. Now , a hardware, unless requires a highly specialized operation and knowledge, can be manufactured in developing countries. The change of scenes suggests that Japan needs to focus something different and exportable to the emerging markets. As mentioned, Japanese life style products (which I loosely define it with connection to life sciences, smart city, and cultural stuff e.g. "Cool Japan") have competitive advantages in quality. What is needed is a business model to monetize the product and strategic plan to make it successful and sustainable. Furthermore, the future "product" does not necessarily have to be a tangible (i.e. hardware), but something intangible; culture, system, regulations, or life styles.

Japanese automobile companies should, instead of developing thousands of features that will only be used for few occasions, invest on the environment that users drive their cars. The industry, along with public services, should together work on transportation management of country and export their best practices to other nations. Train system has already been preceded to such exploration. For automobiles, one of Japan's main industries, the companies and government can together work on more efficient system to utilize the vehicles by economical and ecological standard. Systems such as car sharing or EV sharing have been demonstrated and experimented mainly by the public research group throughout almost a decade. As a first runner in the industry, and the pioneer of ecological vehicles, more collaboration across the industry are highly expected for the next economical growth imperative. As for another imperative, Japan should be a leader in medical service system. With the fastest aging society, Japan also can be the first runner in the category.

Reviving Entrepreneurial Spirits

Now is not the best time to discuss future economical growth of Japan, or of any developed nations. After the earthquake, or even before, the Japan's national economy has dropped below China and shows no signs of catching up. With rapidly aging society and emergence of new economies in other parts of Asia, it seems that Japan lacks of its economical growth factor. Economists, scholars, and media would argue that Japan needs entrepreneurs to create innovations.

Today, innovation is not so much of Japan's friend.  Instead, the established Japanese corporations hold more than 200 trillion of yen under their sleeves. The corporations will not invest their money for future of Japan, but instead they will invest in business development of emerging market. Investing for new economical potential itself is great for short to midterm. Yet in the long run, the emerging markets will become emerged, which will leave less market potentials for the existing business models. Lets imagine those kids who will be born and grow in Japan, 20 years from now. They will be competing with, not just the kids from neighborhood, but with kids from other countries. In such a circumstance, the mind of entrepreneur to create innovation, to take action, and not to afraid taking risks, will be the core of competence as well as the fundamental studies prolonged from previous generations.

With compelling automobiles, technology, and other manufacturing quality, Japan has become one of the most powerful economies in the world. This is truly an amazing achievement of great entrepreneurs such are Kounousuke Mathusita of Panasonic, Soichiro Honda of Honda and Akio Morita of Sony. It is important to note that, despite the economic boom boosted, Japan achieved its position purely from business. While some countries engaged in war for partially economical reasons, Japanese samurai business persons worked around the clock, and demonstrated that a country can become such an economical power without having resource. Japan after the Great War was literally shaped by ventures. We need to re-confirm this fact and encourage the young people who will create the future of Japan.

The role of media, as well as education, is important for reviving entrepreneurship in Japan. Japanese young workers, especially in their 20s and 30s, oversaw a dot-com bubble and how a successful Japanese internet start-up, Livedoor, got bashed and singled-out by the media. For the corporate injustice of manipulating their securities in wrong means, Livedoor was accused and the founder, Takafumi Horie, was charged. There is no way of justifying such a corporate crime activity; however, the reaction of media has been unjustly negative that people might have got the wrong impression of start-up companies. After all, every corporate was once a start-up, and the macro economy, the roles of large corporate and start-up are totally different and are each absolutely necessary. With that lesson-learned, I believe the renaissance for Japanese entrepreneurs is on its way forward.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

The Mind of Entrepreneur





Dear Steve,

You have come to the world and made it better place to live.

Your vision for innovative product,
design ability to deploy minimal functionality,
and bold decision-making at fast-changing environment;
all of these attributes are great in individual.
I understand that much of praises fall into them.

Yet the way I see it, is that it is your gut and soul as an entrepreneur 
that have made all the difference. 

You said that you "didn't know what to do for few month"
after fired from Apple at the age of 30.

"I felt I dropped the baton that previous generation of entrepreneurs passed on to me"
and you try to "apologize for screwing up so badly". 

I used to think that innovation comes from a great vision,
beautiful design, and best decision-making. 
Although they are all components of a great product, 
it seems that the hidden recipe of innovation is not only from the "cool stuff" but
from "nitty-gritties (mentality, passion, and sincerity) ".

The spirit of a true entrepreneur would never give up. 
After Apple, you started two new companies, and succeeded in both of them.
Then you came back to Apple, and the rest, as we know it, became a legend.

I cannot say anymore than "awe" but to try to put it in my words,
you believed that your vision of future held some kind of truth for people.

Steve, your speech, the way of thinking, vision, and leadership;
they are and will be on the textbook for generations to come.

You have a wonderful family and that is the best thing one could ever have.


And Apple, is just an "insanely great" company. 
They have made it to number one in market capitalization just few month ago.
Still it has a lot more to go, and I think Apple will prosper, for good. 

Good bye, Steve. Rest in peace. 

* A copy from my message to rememberingsteve at apple.com

 


Saturday, September 24, 2011

Strengthfinder


Here are my top 5 strengths;
  1. Maximizer (85%):People strong in the Maximizer theme focus on strengths as a way to stimulate personal and group excellence. They seek to transform something strong into something superb.

    Tips to Improve this Strength:
    • Maintain your focus on improving working things and not fixing the broken things.
    • Avoid roles that require continual problem solving.
    • You get frustrated focusing on your weaknesses for too long - try to minimize this.
    • You dislike career paths that trade money for veering off your strengths path - avoid them.
    • Seek to lead a task force to investigate company best practices.
    • Participate in or design a program for measuring and celebrating employee productivity.

  2. Significance (75%):
    People strong in the Significance theme want to be very important in the eyes of others. They are independent and want to be recognized.

    Tips to Improve this Strength:
    • You are not to be overmanaged - you need independence and should let others know this.
    • You thrive on meaningful recognition of your contributions and should let supervisors know.
    • You need the opportunity to stand out and be known - seek appropriate room to maneuver.
    • You like to surround yourself with the best of the best and should continue to do as such.
    • You are good at encouraging other top achievers - you enjoy making others feel successful.
    • Make and keep benchmarks for developing your main strengths.
    • When suffering self-esteem hits, set new goals based on your strengths and go for them!

  3. Ideation (65%):
    People strong in the Ideation theme are fascinated by ideas. They are able to find connections between seemingly disparate phenomena.

    Tips to Improve this Strength:
    • Actively seek out positions where your ideas will be valued and encouraged.
    • Be a designer, sales strategies, marketing guru, or customer service rep for new products and ideas.
    • Search out and request ideas from others to stimulate your thinking.
    • Constantly think of ideas that can improve businesses and the lives of others.
    • You enjoy the power of words; punchy ideas stimulate your thinking - focus and play with this fact.
    • For decisions, you need to know that everything fits together. Be aware and plan for decisions.
    • If a decision seems to stand out as particularly bothersome, then check if it is an exception before worrying about it.

  4. Restorative (65%):
    People strong in the Restorative theme are adept at dealing with problems. They are good at figuring out what is wrong and resolving it.

    Tips to Improve this Strength:
    • Seek out to identify problems in companies and systems.
    • Seek a position where you are paid to solve problems for the company's best customers.
    • Look for positions where you are the person for the job when things need immediate improvement.
    • Plan and do celebrate the achievement when you solve a problem.
    • Be careful - you may feel defeated if a situation remains unsolved - continually evaluate and ask for help, if needed.

  5. Futuristic (60%):
    People strong in the Futuristic theme are inspired by the future and what could be. They inspire others with their visions of the future.

    Tips to Improve this Strength:
    • Seek to share your visions of the future with others and hear others' ideas, too.
    • Seek to share your perspectives on company news, meetings, and projects.
    • Look for (and digest!) news and articles that cover the future plans of things.
    • Work with or on a planning committee and keep up or review its progress.
    • Look for roles where you will be pushed to see the future as vividly as possible.
    • Actively help others to rise above the present and be excited about the future.


Remaining Results Are (In Order):


Self-Assurance (60%):   People strong in the Self-assurance theme feel confident in their ability to manage their own lives. They possess an inner compass that gives them confidence that their decisions are right.

Communication (60%):   People strong in the Communication theme generally find it easy to put their thoughts into words. They are good conversationalists and presenters.

Focus (60%):   People strong in the Focus theme can take a direction, follow through, and make the corrections necessary to stay on track. They prioritize, then act.

Command (60%):   People strong in the Command theme have presence. They can take control of a situation and make decisions.

Arranger (60%):   People strong in the Arranger theme can organize, but they also have a flexibility that complements this ability. They like to figure out how all of the pieces and resources can be arranged for maximum productivity.

Analytical (55%):   People strong in the Analytical theme search for reasons and causes. They have the ability to think about all the factors that might affect a situation.

Harmony (50%):   People strong in the Harmony theme look for consensus. They don't enjoy conflict; rather, they seek areas of agreement.

Strategic (50%):   People strong in the Strategic theme create alternative ways to proceed. Faced with any given scenario, they can quickly spot the relevant patterns and issues.

Competition (50%):   People strong in the Competition theme measure their progress against the performance of others. They strive to win first place and revel in contests.

Relator (50%):   People who are strong in the Relator theme enjoy close relationships with others. They find deep satisfaction in working hard with friends to achieve a goal.

Belief (50%):   People strong in the Belief theme have certain core values that are unchanging. Out of these values emerges a defined purpose for their life.

Deliberative (50%):   People strong in the Deliberative theme are best described by the serious care they take in making decisions or choices. They anticipate the obstacles.

Discipline (50%):   People strong in the Discipline theme enjoy routine and structure. Their world is best described by the order they create.

Developer (50%):   People strong in the Developer theme recognize and cultivate the potential in others. They spot the signs of each small improvement and derive satisfaction from these improvements.

Activator (45%):   People strong in the Activator theme can make things happen by turning thoughts into action. They are often impatient.

Learner (45%):   People strong in the Learner theme have a great desire to learn and want to continuously improve. In particular, the process of learning, rather than the outcome, excites them.

Fairness (45%):   People strong in the Consistency theme (also called Fairness in the first StrengthsFinder assessment) are keenly aware of the need to treat people the same. They try to treat everyone in the world fairly by setting up clear rules and adhering to them.

Responsibility (45%):   People strong in the Responsibility theme take psychological ownership of what they say they will do. They are committed to stable values such as honesty and loyalty.

Connectedness (40%):   People strong in the Connectedness theme have faith in the links between all things. They believe there are few coincidences and that almost every event has a reason.

Context (40%):   People strong in the Context theme enjoy thinking about the past. They understand the present by researching its history.

Adaptability (40%):   People strong in the Adaptability theme prefer to 'go with the flow.' They tend to be 'now' people who take things as they come and discover the future one day at a time.

Intellection (40%):   People strong in the Intellection theme are characterized by their intellectual activity. They are introspective and appreciate intellectual discussions.

Positivity (40%):   People strong in the Positivity theme have an enthusiasm that is contagious. They are upbeat and can get others excited about what they are going to do.

Empathy (35%):   People strong in the Empathy theme can sense the feelings of other people by imagining themselves in others' lives or others' situations.

Input (35%):   People strong in the Input theme have a craving to know more. Often they like to collect and archive all kinds of information.

Achiever (35%):   People strong in the Achiever theme have a great deal of stamina and work hard. They take great satisfaction from being busy and productive.

Woo (30%):   People strong in the Woo theme love the challenge of meeting new people and winning them over. They derive satisfaction from breaking the ice and making a connection with another person.

Inclusiveness (30%):   People strong in the Inclusiveness theme are accepting of others. They show awareness of those who feel left out, and make an effort to include them.

Individualization (20%):   People strong in the Individualization theme are intrigued with the unique qualities of each person. They have a gift for figuring out how people who are different can work together productively.